Audit Questions Tribe's Spending of $1.4M for Water Infrastructure
PIERRE, S.D. (AP) — A Native American tribe in South Dakota misspent or couldn’t account for roughly $1.4 million in federal funds for a rural water system, including thousands of dollars paid to officials for meetings they didn’t attend and money spent on a backhoe that couldn’t be found, according to a government audit report released Wednesday.
The Interior Department’s Office of Inspector General reviewed roughly $2.6 million worth of grant money, interviewing federal and tribal employees and reviewing tribal financial documents.
The audit, launched after human rights organization alleged financial mismanagement in the Lower Brule Sioux tribe’s government last year, found the tribe claimed $1.44 million in costs for the operation and maintenance of a water system between 2012 and 2015 that were unsupported, unallowable or unreasonable.
The resulting report calls for increased oversight by the U.S. Bureau of Reclamation, a water management agency in the Interior Department that the report said didn’t adequately review federal financial reports submitted by the tribe before approving them. The bureau has an agreement with the tribe for the operation, maintenance and administration of the Lower Brule Sioux Rural Water System, which includes a plant that treats water from the Missouri River for rural tribal consumers and several nontribal towns.
The tribe’s secretary and treasurer, Orville Langdeau, didn’t immediately respond to a telephone message requesting comment from The Associated Press.
According to the report, officials found about $315,000 in payments to vendors and others without adequate documentation. For example, a roughly $35,000 invoice from 2012 for painting a water tower reads “Bill for painting water tower,” and did not come with documentation such as timesheets or material and supply lists. The tribe also paid $7,000 for a Caterpillar backhoe that later couldn’t be located.
Auditors discovered about $204,000 in internal transactions in the tribe’s accounting system that didn’t have adequate documentation. The tribe paid employees over $103,000 for things like incentive bonuses without supporting records. Members of a steering committee over a 2 1/2 year period received overpayments for attending meetings or compensation for meetings they weren’t at totaling more than $24,000.
The audit also uncovered a more than $880,000 discrepancy between expenses on federal financial reports and the tribe’s general ledger, and nearly $40,000 in unallowable payments to vendors — including more than $2,000 spent on a 2013 Christmas party for 50 guests at a restaurant in Pierre.
The Inspector General’s office will refer its recommendations, which include developing better review procedures, to the Office of Policy, Management and Budget.
The Bureau of Reclamation intends to make contact with the tribal government by the end of the year to discuss resolving the financial issues highlighted in the audit, according to an agency response.
The Interior Department’s watchdog office is still investigating the circumstances surrounding the tribe’s purchase of a New York-based brokerage firm called Westrock Advisors Inc. that ultimately went bankrupt.
Related News
From Archive
- OSHA issues 16 citations following fatal sewer confined space incident
- 27 pipeline safety violations tied to deadly Pa. chocolate factory explosion
- Contractor gas line strike triggers home explosion in Missouri
- LA recovery reports call for $650 million power line burial, major utility upgrades in Pacific Palisades
- Comprehensive microtrenching FAQ: Key insights on the Vermeer MTR516 microtrencher
- T-Mobile to expand fiber broadband infrastructure footprint with $4.9 billion Metronet acquisition
- First tunnel boring machines complete testing for Hudson Tunnel Project
- NWPX grows water infrastructure portfolio with Colorado precast facility
- Cityside launches $100 million fiber build in Corona, Calif.
- FiberLight to build 1,400-mile West Texas dark fiber network in $350 million expansion

Comments