Maryland lawmakers push to curb BGE pipeline spending, citing safety and cost concerns
(UI) — Maryland lawmakers and regulators are raising concerns over Baltimore Gas & Electric’s (BGE) multibillion-dollar pipeline replacement program, citing rising costs for consumers and questions about its effectiveness in improving safety.
At the center of the debate is BGE’s full-scale gas pipeline replacement program, which has contributed to a tripling of gas delivery rates over the past decade, according to Maryland PIRG. The organization stated that the utility’s approach has led to excessive spending on infrastructure expansion rather than prioritizing pipeline repairs and leak mitigation.
“Maryland residents are being burdened by high energy costs because of BGE’s unnecessary spending on the full-scale replacement of costly, polluting methane gas pipelines,” said Del. Elizabeth Embry. “It shouldn’t cost a fortune to stay warm and comfortable during the cold.”
Embry has introduced the Ratepayer Protection Act (HB0419), a bill that would require utilities to focus on identifying and repairing gas leaks rather than undertaking large-scale pipeline replacements. The legislation, which has support from state officials and consumer advocacy groups, aims to rein in infrastructure costs while ensuring safety improvements.
Pipeline replacement raises safety questions
Despite the scale of BGE’s pipeline replacement efforts, hazardous gas leaks in the utility’s system have increased, according to federal data. The number of reported leaks rose from 2,400 in 2011 to over 4,000 in 2023, raising concerns about the effectiveness of current investment strategies.
“BGE’s multibillion-dollar pipeline replacement program has failed to improve safety and is a financial disaster. We urge the legislature to intervene now, before things get worse,” said Emily Scarr, Senior Advisor at Maryland PIRG.
Advocates argue that a more targeted approach—focusing on repairing existing infrastructure rather than wholesale pipeline replacements—would be more cost-effective and improve safety outcomes.
Regulatory and industry stakeholders are expected to weigh in on how utilities balance pipeline safety, cost efficiency, and long-term infrastructure resilience.
Related News
From Archive
- OSHA issues 16 citations following fatal sewer confined space incident
- 27 pipeline safety violations tied to deadly Pa. chocolate factory explosion
- Contractor gas line strike triggers home explosion in Missouri
- LA recovery reports call for $650 million power line burial, major utility upgrades in Pacific Palisades
- Comprehensive microtrenching FAQ: Key insights on the Vermeer MTR516 microtrencher
- T-Mobile to expand fiber broadband infrastructure footprint with $4.9 billion Metronet acquisition
- First tunnel boring machines complete testing for Hudson Tunnel Project
- NWPX grows water infrastructure portfolio with Colorado precast facility
- Cityside launches $100 million fiber build in Corona, Calif.
- FiberLight to build 1,400-mile West Texas dark fiber network in $350 million expansion
Comments