N.Y. lawmakers propose pipeline mapping rules for leak-prone gas lines

(UI) — New York state lawmakers have introduced legislation that would require natural gas utilities to disclose detailed plans for repairing, replacing, and retiring aging gas pipelines, increasing regulatory oversight of leak-prone distribution infrastructure.

State Sen. Kristen Gonzalez and Assemblymember Emily Gallagher announced the introduction of the Pipeline Leaks and Safety Act (S9075/A10071) on Feb. 6. The bill would require gas utilities to file system maps with the New York Public Service Commission (PSC) identifying planned or foreseeable work on gas distribution lines, including replacement, repair, renewal, and decommissioning activities.

Supporters say the measure is intended to improve transparency and long-term planning as New York works toward emissions-reduction targets established under the Climate Leadership and Community Protection Act (CLCPA). Similar pipeline-mapping requirements have been implemented in Massachusetts and California.

The proposal follows renewed debate over the state’s climate goals, after reports that the governor’s office is considering adjustments to CLCPA implementation timelines. State officials have acknowledged New York is not currently on track to meet its statutory decarbonization targets.

“The era of mystery around fossil fuel pipelines ends here. New Yorkers deserve transparency about the infrastructure polluting their neighborhoods,” Gonzalez said. “By mapping decades-old gas mains and prioritizing areas for decarbonization, we can protect consumers, reduce pollution, and save money; all while aligning utility practices with New York’s CLCPA goals.”

Gallagher said ongoing repairs to aging gas infrastructure are contributing to higher utility costs while posing safety risks. “Antiquated, leak-prone gas infrastructure is harming New Yorkers,” she said. “Endless repairs on this outdated infrastructure is the number one thing driving up the cost of utilities.”

Industry and advocacy groups supporting the bill argue that greater visibility into pipeline replacement plans could encourage alternatives to traditional pipe replacement in certain areas. “Replacing leak prone pipe is very expensive, and often not necessary, thanks to affordable non pipe alternatives like electrification and ground source heat pumps,” said Christine Hoffer, executive director of the New York Geothermal Energy Organization.

Others emphasized the regulatory implications of continued investment in legacy gas systems. “Utilities’ leaking pipeline replacement programs continue as opaque, multi-billion-dollar spending vehicles with little proof of safety or reliability benefits,” said Kim Fraczek, director of Sane Energy Project.

Audrey Schulman, co-executive director of HEET, said utilities should be required to justify pipeline replacement spending. “If gas companies are going to spend billions every year replacing pipes—money that customers will have to pay back over decades into the future—the companies should at least have to tell customers which pipes and why.”

If enacted, the legislation would add new reporting and planning requirements for gas utilities operating in New York and could influence how pipeline replacement programs are evaluated by regulators.

Related News

From Archive

• Most Read
• Most Commented