John Deere recalls 50 workers across Midwest plants to support production growth
(UI) - John Deere is recalling nearly 50 employees across manufacturing facilities in Iowa and Kansas as demand for construction, forestry and drivetrain equipment continues to strengthen.
The latest round of callbacks includes workers returning to Dubuque Works and Davenport Works in Iowa, as well as Coffeyville Works in Kansas, to support fabrication, assembly and material handling operations. The employees are expected to return to work in April.
The move follows multiple rounds of workforce recalls earlier this year, bringing the total number of U.S. employees returning to John Deere facilities to more than 300 since January.
The increase in staffing reflects improving market conditions and rising production demand across key equipment segments tied to infrastructure development and industrial activity.
John Deere’s Dubuque and Davenport facilities manufacture a range of construction and forestry equipment, while Coffeyville supports drivetrain and power system component production used across the company’s equipment portfolio.
The company said the additional workforce will help meet growing production needs as equipment demand continues to recover.
Related News
From Archive
- Fatal trench collapse in Mass. leads to $4.6 million OSHA penalty, dozens of violations
- OSHA investigates fatal trench collapse at Conroe construction site
- Final Lake Erie sewer tunnel project set to begin after decades-long $3 billion effort
- Texas811 launches real-time excavation detection to prevent utility strikes
- Fiber drilling strike triggers major sewer failure, lawsuits in Florida
- Fatal trench collapse in Mass. leads to $4.6 million OSHA penalty, dozens of violations
- Texas811 launches real-time excavation detection to prevent utility strikes
- Race Communications breaks ground on Bakersfield fiber network
- Final Lake Erie sewer tunnel project set to begin after decades-long $3 billion effort
- Inside Infrastructure: Utility locators warn of systemic failures in damage prevention process
Comments