Utility Wins Sixth Straight J.D. Power Customer Satisfaction Award
PPL Electric Utilities today announced J.D. Power has ranked the company highest for residential customer satisfaction in its class in the eastern United States for the sixth consecutive year.
“PPL employees come to work each day with a mindset that puts customers first,” said Greg Dudkin, president of PPL Electric Utilities. “I dedicate this award to our people, whose tradition of excellence, innovation and commitment delivers reliable and affordable electric service for homes and businesses in our area.”
Companies are ranked on a 1,000-point scale, and PPL’s score of 739 was 35 points higher than the average score in the large utility group in the eastern United States, which includes 16 utilities. According to J.D. Power, the national average among all types and sizes of electric utilities, including electric cooperatives, was 719.
Utility “Our business is delivering safe, reliable power, but our employees who help make that happen also live and work in the cities and towns we serve. They’re volunteering to make those communities better places,” Dudkin said. “They’re helping customers save energy and money. They’re respecting and protecting the environment.”
Related News
From Archive
- OSHA investigates fatal trench collapse at Conroe construction site
- Final Lake Erie sewer tunnel project set to begin after decades-long $3 billion effort
- Texas811 launches real-time excavation detection to prevent utility strikes
- Oil pipeline struck during fiber optic construction spills into L.A. storm drains
- Fiber drilling strike triggers major sewer failure, lawsuits in Florida
- Fatal trench collapse in Mass. leads to $4.6 million OSHA penalty, dozens of violations
- Texas811 launches real-time excavation detection to prevent utility strikes
- Race Communications breaks ground on Bakersfield fiber network
- Final Lake Erie sewer tunnel project set to begin after decades-long $3 billion effort
- Inside Infrastructure: Utility locators warn of systemic failures in damage prevention process

Comments